Hi,
it just took too long incorporating the C++ wrappers, so I lost interest a bit (No offense, Giovanni!)
We aren't currently using C++ for our product anymore, so ...
Just a few points (I reviewed Korken's changes a bit):
1) static inlines allow the compiler to optimize a function for each ...
Search found 18 matches
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:26 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
- Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:16 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi,
attached please find a rebased and beautified version of the c++-wrappers.
Hopefully all issues should be addressed, please review.
I've squashed more or less all individual commits into one large, as they did not
support reviewing anyway, so its more or less a rewrite of ch.cpp (deleted and ...
attached please find a rebased and beautified version of the c++-wrappers.
Hopefully all issues should be addressed, please review.
I've squashed more or less all individual commits into one large, as they did not
support reviewing anyway, so its more or less a rewrite of ch.cpp (deleted and ...
- Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:07 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi,
to allow me to post the next version of the C++ wrappers patch, please answer the questions 4 and 9
from the previous posts.
Thx Helmut
to allow me to post the next version of the C++ wrappers patch, please answer the questions 4 and 9
from the previous posts.
Thx Helmut
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:36 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: bug in GCC rules.mk
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4194
bug in GCC rules.mk
Hi,
this bug only triggers in rather rare circumstances.
Please check the message in the patch for details.
Helmut
this bug only triggers in rather rare circumstances.
Please check the message in the patch for details.
Helmut
- Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:20 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Giovanni wrote:Hi,
Fixed that error, it was caused by a recent change.
Giovanni
Hi,
in which commit?
... OK, just saw it its 9610, sorry.
The question now is, how is often is the github mirror updated?
Helmut
- Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:13 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi,
I'm having hard times to rebase the wrappers to trunk, stumbling over compile errors again and again ...
../../../os/hal/src/hal_usb.c: In function 'usbStop':
../../../os/hal/src/hal_usb.c:324:3: error: 'spip ...
I'm having hard times to rebase the wrappers to trunk, stumbling over compile errors again and again ...
../../../os/hal/src/hal_usb.c: In function 'usbStop':
../../../os/hal/src/hal_usb.c:324:3: error: 'spip ...
- Wed Jun 08, 2016 1:29 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi Jovanni,
just went through the coding style (again). I just wonder: Is there a reason for pressing C89
it is just ANCIENT, it might be legitimate not to go C11, but at least I know of no single C-compiler,
that does not support C99 (which is 17 years old )
Helmut
PS: I don't want to start a ...
just went through the coding style (again). I just wonder: Is there a reason for pressing C89
it is just ANCIENT, it might be legitimate not to go C11, but at least I know of no single C-compiler,
that does not support C99 (which is 17 years old )
Helmut
PS: I don't want to start a ...
- Wed Jun 08, 2016 12:21 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi,
I just stumbled over a trouble which I was expecting when rebasing to trunk.
'trunk' as svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/chibios/svn/trunk@9602 just does not compile RT-STM32F407-DISCOVER-G++,
making it hard to test my changes.
Questions 2, 4, 9 and probably 10 are still open.
Helmut
I just stumbled over a trouble which I was expecting when rebasing to trunk.
'trunk' as svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/chibios/svn/trunk@9602 just does not compile RT-STM32F407-DISCOVER-G++,
making it hard to test my changes.
Questions 2, 4, 9 and probably 10 are still open.
Helmut
- Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:50 am
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi Jovanni,
thanx for review.
1) this is quite obvious, as I was changing against stable_16.1.x dated 10.4.2016, I'll rebase to any version you define!
Your trunk is a somewhat 'moving target', maybe you can give me a dedicated version (best from the github mirror).
2) shell.c changes are ...
thanx for review.
1) this is quite obvious, as I was changing against stable_16.1.x dated 10.4.2016, I'll rebase to any version you define!
Your trunk is a somewhat 'moving target', maybe you can give me a dedicated version (best from the github mirror).
2) shell.c changes are ...
- Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:21 am
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: C++ wrappers
- Replies: 84
- Views: 77088
Re: C++ wrappers
Hi,
any progress with the wrappers? I don't want that to fizzle out, it was quite some work.
If I can do something to allow the wrappers be part of the next ChibiOS version I'm prepared
to take the effort.
As I mentioned before we'll go further and support exception handling in the next step ...
any progress with the wrappers? I don't want that to fizzle out, it was quite some work.
If I can do something to allow the wrappers be part of the next ChibiOS version I'm prepared
to take the effort.
As I mentioned before we'll go further and support exception handling in the next step ...