Page 4 of 9
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:15 pm
by Giovanni
Merged the two threads.
Giovanni
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 2:30 pm
by Giovanni
Any news on this front?
I hope to have a full release sometime in February.
Giovanni
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:22 am
by Marco
Hi Giovanni,
I have been quite busy last weeks (and still) so i didn't continue my work on this. I will make sure all the work so far is in the git repository. If i remember correct i started working on a PPPoE netif but didn't know how to continue.
For this upcoming release a working Ethernet and PPPoS driver should be feasible IMO. I'll try to clean it a bit so you can include it in the release.
Marco
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:34 pm
by steved
I've updated the lwIP bindings to work with lwIP V2.0.2.
This also incorporates iggarpe's buffer patch (and a file without it)
Basic testing with the web server is fine
Using the 17.6.0 release
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:51 pm
by Giovanni
Thanks, I will try to integrate before next release.
Giovanni
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:56 pm
by steved
As an addendum, I'm sure I've seen a post on this (duplicate definition of struct timeval), but can't find it. From lwip's sockets.h:
Code: Select all
/** LWIP_TIMEVAL_PRIVATE: if you want to use the struct timeval provided
* by your system, set this to 0 and include <sys/time.h> in cc.h */
(Applies to both 1.4 and 2.0)
My inclination would be to set LWIP_TIMEVAL_PRIVATE to zero and do the include in Chibi's cc.h; in an ideal world I can see no need to override a standard definition. However the non-GCC world may be less than ideal; might this need to be a project-configurable option?
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:25 pm
by Giovanni
Hi,
At very least there could be an #ifndef around the definition so it can be set in prjects options.
Giovanni
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:52 pm
by steved
Giovanni wrote:At very least there could be an #ifndef around the definition so it can be set in prjects options.
Works better than expected - looks like the include order gets the message through OK (which I didn't expect on a cursory glance).
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:44 am
by steved
I've updated the bindings to address bug #729 - all works fine on a quick check (although also worked fine before).
Bug #824 was addressed in the previous upload.
Re: [INFO] lwIP version 2.0
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 12:30 pm
by Giovanni
Do demos require adjustments after implementing this change?
Giovanni