Page 1 of 1

CH_DBG_TRACE_MASK inverted logic?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:05 am
by faisal
Not sure if this is a feature or a bug, but it sure is confusing.

It seems that CH_DBG_TRACE_MASK is a mask of events to *DISABLE*, as the buffer.suspend variable gets initialized to this. If this is the intended logic, perhaps the comments/documentation can describe this more clearly.

Re: CH_DBG_TRACE_MASK inverted logic?

Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:00 pm
by Giovanni
bump