The FSF is right of course it could be used in a commercial product, I should have stated "closed source commercial product" but I thought this was clear from the context.
Thanks for your clarification.
The context is far from clear, because the next line under "Pure GPL3" says "Do I have to ...
Search found 10 matches
- Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:51 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: Confused about licence
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4976
- Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:06 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: Confused about licence
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4976
Confused about licence
Hi,
In m states that there is a pure-GPLv3 licence option, but then in the table under "Pure GPL3" it says "Can I use ChibiOS/RT in my commercial embedded product? : no "
The GPLv3 licence allows commercial use, so the two statements conflict. Either ChibiOS has a pure GPLv3 licence option which ...
In m states that there is a pure-GPLv3 licence option, but then in the table under "Pure GPL3" it says "Can I use ChibiOS/RT in my commercial embedded product? : no "
The GPLv3 licence allows commercial use, so the two statements conflict. Either ChibiOS has a pure GPLv3 licence option which ...
- Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:30 pm
- Forum: LCD Driver and Graphic Framework
- Topic: Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
- Replies: 17
- Views: 67886
Re: [IMPORTANT] Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
Okay, the new website is now online, but we are still missing a logo!
---> http://chibios-gfx.com <---
Please tell me your thoughts!
~Tectu
m
Despite the previous discussion, it seems that ChibiOS/GFX still has a non-commercial restriction on the GPLv3 licence and therefore does not ...
---> http://chibios-gfx.com <---
Please tell me your thoughts!
~Tectu
m
Despite the previous discussion, it seems that ChibiOS/GFX still has a non-commercial restriction on the GPLv3 licence and therefore does not ...
- Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:20 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: LPC1114: "'mask" undeclared using palWritePad
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3739
Re: LPC1114: "'mask" undeclared using palWritePad
Ok, looks like a simple fix:
@@ -266,11 +266,11 @@ typedef LPC_GPIO_TypeDef *ioportid_t;
* @p PAL_HIGH
*
* @notapi
*/
#define pal_lld_writepad(port, pad, bit) \
- ((port)->MASKED_ACCESS[(mask) << (pad)] = (bit) << (pad))
+ ((port)->MASKED_ACCESS[1 << (pad)] = (bit) << (pad ...
@@ -266,11 +266,11 @@ typedef LPC_GPIO_TypeDef *ioportid_t;
* @p PAL_HIGH
*
* @notapi
*/
#define pal_lld_writepad(port, pad, bit) \
- ((port)->MASKED_ACCESS[(mask) << (pad)] = (bit) << (pad))
+ ((port)->MASKED_ACCESS[1 << (pad)] = (bit) << (pad ...
- Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:42 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: LPC1114: "'mask" undeclared using palWritePad
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3739
LPC1114: "'mask" undeclared using palWritePad
Hi there,
I am using LPC1114 target, and I am calling palWritePad()
I get the error
error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this function)
when compiling.
Looking at the code, there appears to be a bug in os/hal/platforms/LPC11xx/pal_lld.h
/**
* @brief Writes a logical state on an output pad ...
I am using LPC1114 target, and I am calling palWritePad()
I get the error
error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this function)
when compiling.
Looking at the code, there appears to be a bug in os/hal/platforms/LPC11xx/pal_lld.h
/**
* @brief Writes a logical state on an output pad ...
- Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:46 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: Optimization level 1 and s do not work with STM32F051 demo
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7705
Optimization level 1 and s do not work with STM32F051 demo
Hi there,
I am using the STM32F051-DISCOVERY example. I find that when setting optimization to level 1 or s, the demo does not run. The demo works find when optimization is set to 0 or 2.
I am guessing this is probably similar issue to previous problems caused by optimization (an exception occurs ...
I am using the STM32F051-DISCOVERY example. I find that when setting optimization to level 1 or s, the demo does not run. The demo works find when optimization is set to 0 or 2.
I am guessing this is probably similar issue to previous problems caused by optimization (an exception occurs ...
- Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:36 pm
- Forum: LCD Driver and Graphic Framework
- Topic: Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
- Replies: 17
- Views: 67886
Re: [IMPORTANT] Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
Open source does mean that each an every one can see the source code. But this dosen't give you any right to use the code in commercial products (or copy it)!
This model is quite often used in open source projects. For example, ChibiOS/RT does it the exact same way
Anyways, there will be more ...
This model is quite often used in open source projects. For example, ChibiOS/RT does it the exact same way
Anyways, there will be more ...
- Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:17 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: High-Resolution Timer proposal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 20968
Re: High-Resolution Timer proposal
I apologize if my previous message didn't make sense, I am still getting to grips with Chibios and had misunderstood the documentation. The GPT seems to do exactly what I want, I had the impression the GPT only works with system ticks (CH_FREQUENCY) but this seems not the case.
I am still unsure of ...
I am still unsure of ...
- Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:58 am
- Forum: LCD Driver and Graphic Framework
- Topic: Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
- Replies: 17
- Views: 67886
Re: [IMPORTANT] Announcement of chibios-gfx.com
Sorry if this is a rehash, but if there is a non-commercial restriction in the license then it is not Open Source. Is that the intention?
- Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:44 pm
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: High-Resolution Timer proposal
- Replies: 24
- Views: 20968
Re: High-Resolution Timer proposal
Hi guys,
I really need a high-res timer too. I would be quite happy if it mapped directly to a hardware timer with a minimum of overhead. I really wouldn't want more than 1us overhead calling a single timer callback. It would be ok (probably better) if it was kept separate to GPT. I have found from ...
I really need a high-res timer too. I would be quite happy if it mapped directly to a hardware timer with a minimum of overhead. I really wouldn't want more than 1us overhead calling a single timer callback. It would be ok (probably better) if it was kept separate to GPT. I have found from ...